[SCA-Dance] KWDS report (What I Did on my Summer Vacation...)

David Learmonth david.a.learmonth at gmail.com
Wed Jul 22 18:23:34 EDT 2009

I think we can Definitely all agree that, as best as possible, we should be
aiming to line up the next few KWDSes in a row at this point, to help with
planning, and with bureaucracy.  (and financial planning for attendees too)
:)  I think that would begin to help quite a bit.

If it is bi-ennial, then just having the next 2 lined up is probably good.
If it is annual, then probably the next 3 (or even 4 possibly, though that
seems ambitious).


On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Monique Rio <nique.rio at gmail.com> wrote:

> Another complaint is that only having one year of lead time isn't
> enough time to plan an event of this scale. This is a bit misleading.
> Why do we need to only have a year of lead-time? We could still know
> at least two (or more) years ahead of time where the next two KWDSs
> will be. It seems people liked knowing several years in advance about
> Australia. Why don't we just do this regularly? Also, this has another
> advantage. In 2011, the organizers of the 2012 site can be a part of
> the 2011 organizing committee (or at least on the mailing list). That
> way the 2012 people have an inside view of what they're likely to
> experience next year.
> With KWDSs spaced 2 years apart, this kind of involvement with
> successive hosters is not really possible. We don't even know where
> the next one will be at the current KWDS.
> -Jadzia
> Cynnabar Musician, Singer, and Dancer
> --------------
> http://www.blowthyhorn.com ~ Choir Directing & Early Music
> ________________________________________________________________
> To send mail to the entire list, be sure sca-dance at sca-dance.org is listed
> in the To line of any response.
> To Unsubscribe send mail to: sca-dance-request at sca-dance.org
> ________________________________________________________________

More information about the Sca-dance mailing list