RFC6154 and upgrade to Cyrus 2.5
Per olof Ljungmark
peo at intersonic.se
Mon Oct 19 17:32:27 EDT 2015
On 2015-10-18 12:09, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, at 03:25, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-10-16 15:00, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
>>> --On 16. Oktober 2015 14:56:32 +0200 Per olof Ljungmark
>>> <peo at intersonic.se> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If the xlist folder flags worked in 2.4, why were they removed
>>>> in 2.5?
>>>
>>> Because XLIST was a hack that was first introduced and then
>>> deprecated by Google. Leave it to Microsoft to rely on hacks.
>>
>> OK, I can understand that. But it is still the way you redirect
>> your OL users to have their sent mail etc ending up in the right
>> place.
>>
>> This looks like a show stopper for for us to go to 2.5 then.
>
> The XLIST command still works fine, and gets the special use flags
> (including magic \Inbox for XLIST but not list-return-specialuse) -
> the only change is that instead of hard-coding the names for everyone
> on the server, you use the specialuse annotation from the RFC to set
> which folders have which special-use, allowing users with different
> language folders on the same server.
>
> It does mean that your provisioning system needs to support creating
> with a use, like this:
>
> TAG CREATE INBOX.Trash (USE (\Trash))
>
> You could definitely create a case for improving the tooling around
> that, and maybe even adding support to the autocreate options. I
> think we'd be happy to backport that to 2.5.
"create a case" as in enter a Bugzilla request? I wish we could support
in development but that would be more than we can master.
Thank you and sorry for not getting the point properly...
//per
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list