possible self-deadlock in idle signal handler

[Bron Gondwana]

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 09:12:55PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2009, at 23:27, baconm at email.unc.edu wrote:
> > This looks like something much more than "well, let me fiddle with  
> > it a bit and submit a patch."  Has anyone with the requisite design  
> > perspective taken a hack at solving it?  I'm assuming that running  
> > idled doesn't ameliorate the problem.
> 
> Running idled probably makes the problem worse, not better.  I don't  
> know that anyone besides me has even reviewed this code.  And you can  
> see how many people rushed to comment on the issue :)

Yep ;)

Bron ( taking a week off Cyrus to work on some other stuff, mostly )