possible self-deadlock in idle signal handler

[Wesley Craig]

On 28 Mar 2009, at 23:27, baconm at email.unc.edu wrote:
> This looks like something much more than "well, let me fiddle with  
> it a bit and submit a patch."  Has anyone with the requisite design  
> perspective taken a hack at solving it?  I'm assuming that running  
> idled doesn't ameliorate the problem.

Running idled probably makes the problem worse, not better.  I don't  
know that anyone besides me has even reviewed this code.  And you can  
see how many people rushed to comment on the issue :)

:wes