Which 2.3.x version to match 2.2.12 in stability? :-)

Sebastian Hagedorn Hagedorn at uni-koeln.de
Tue Sep 16 09:22:38 EDT 2008

--On 16. September 2008 14:17:57 +0200 Ciprian Marius Vizitiu 
<cvizitiu at gbif.org> wrote:

> As much as I hate it time has come to upgrade my very well behaved Cyrus
> imapd so I was wondering: given the rock solid stability I have
> experienced with 2.2.12 is there any 2.3.x Cyrus with some close record
> of stability?

Sure! 2.3.x is at least as stable as 2.2.x, I'd say even more so. We're 
currently running 2.3.11, but I'd use the latest version. We're planning on 
upgrading soon.
     .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
                   .:.:.:.Skype: shagedorn.:.:.:.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/attachments/20080916/2eba6e55/attachment.bin 

More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list