[Disksim-users] Disksim-users Digest, Vol 81, Issue 9

[信宏陳]

2012/9/1 <disksim-users-request at ece.cmu.edu>

> Send Disksim-users mailing list submissions to
>         disksim-users at ece.cmu.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://sos.ece.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/disksim-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         disksim-users-request at ece.cmu.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         disksim-users-owner at ece.cmu.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Disksim-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. disksim parameter ?timescale? problem (??)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 19:23:05 +0800
> From: ?? <nianglao at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Disksim-users] disksim parameter ?timescale? problem
> To: disksim-users at ece.cmu.edu
> Message-ID:
>         <CAL+t72G6bmh0PoKPwWenay=
> 7DMh855FihsBTdm8TRtsCLQRqfg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi! I run disksim with ssd extention with RAID5. When timscale=1.0, the
> trace "ssd-postmark-aligned2.trace" run in 30s. But when the timescale=0.1,
> it run in 160s! According to the manual of disksim-4.0, timescale
> associates with work loads. Why the trace run much longer when the
> timescale is much smaller?
>

    when timescale change from 1 to 0.1, the interval between two
contiguous requests become larger (10 times? not sure)

   so, execution time will become longer ~




> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://sos.ece.cmu.edu/pipermail/disksim-users/attachments/20120831/ebe0e69b/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Disksim-users mailing list
> Disksim-users at ece.cmu.edu
> https://sos.ece.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/disksim-users
>
>
> End of Disksim-users Digest, Vol 81, Issue 9
> ********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/disksim-users/attachments/20120911/cc1d707b/attachment.html>