Cyrus patches, cyrus patches. Get yer Cyrus patches here

[Ken Murchison]

A lot of the patches (past and present) have been implemented.  Some of 
the others will be implemented in time.  Others may not.


Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> I am not an expert of the Cyrus Project because i'm following the
> development list since only 2 months.
> 
> However i would like to know which are the motivations not to implement
> the fastmail patches into the current cyrus CVS main stream ?
> 
> I read the patches and their motivations and it seems all in good
> quality, motivation and documentation.
> 
> I would be pleased to see most of them committed into the mainstream.
> 
> Waiting for yours
> 
> Regards,
> Fabio Pietrosanti
> 
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:10:08PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>   
>>> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
>>>     
>> I've updated it with two changes - I've removed our renameinbox
>> patch and added a backport of Ken's CVS commit to 2.3.9 instead.
>> Just tested it, it works great.
>>
>> The other change is an update to cyr_dbtool.  It documents the
>> -n option (present in 2.3.9, but not in the manpage) and does
>> all the operations in a single transaction, greatly speeding up
>> multi-record set and delete operations.  In particularly, you
>> can now actually "cyr_dbtool mailboxes.db dump | \
>> cyr_dbtool -n new.db set" and it's fast.  Yay.
>>
>> I think that this is a viable patch for upstream inclusion.
>> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/patches/cyrus-dbtool-transaction-2.3.9.diff
>>
>> Enjoy,
>>
>> Bron.
>>   
> 
> 


-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University