Cyrus patches, cyrus patches. Get yer Cyrus patches here
murch at andrew.cmu.edu
Mon Sep 10 14:38:07 EDT 2007
A lot of the patches (past and present) have been implemented. Some of
the others will be implemented in time. Others may not.
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> I am not an expert of the Cyrus Project because i'm following the
> development list since only 2 months.
> However i would like to know which are the motivations not to implement
> the fastmail patches into the current cyrus CVS main stream ?
> I read the patches and their motivations and it seems all in good
> quality, motivation and documentation.
> I would be pleased to see most of them committed into the mainstream.
> Waiting for yours
> Fabio Pietrosanti
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:10:08PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> I've updated it with two changes - I've removed our renameinbox
>> patch and added a backport of Ken's CVS commit to 2.3.9 instead.
>> Just tested it, it works great.
>> The other change is an update to cyr_dbtool. It documents the
>> -n option (present in 2.3.9, but not in the manpage) and does
>> all the operations in a single transaction, greatly speeding up
>> multi-record set and delete operations. In particularly, you
>> can now actually "cyr_dbtool mailboxes.db dump | \
>> cyr_dbtool -n new.db set" and it's fast. Yay.
>> I think that this is a viable patch for upstream inclusion.
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
More information about the Cyrus-devel