Cyrus patches, cyrus patches. Get yer Cyrus patches here
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
lists at infosecurity.ch
Mon Sep 10 13:39:19 EDT 2007
I am not an expert of the Cyrus Project because i'm following the
development list since only 2 months.
However i would like to know which are the motivations not to implement
the fastmail patches into the current cyrus CVS main stream ?
I read the patches and their motivations and it seems all in good
quality, motivation and documentation.
I would be pleased to see most of them committed into the mainstream.
Waiting for yours
Regards,
Fabio Pietrosanti
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:10:08PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
>> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/
>>
>
> I've updated it with two changes - I've removed our renameinbox
> patch and added a backport of Ken's CVS commit to 2.3.9 instead.
> Just tested it, it works great.
>
> The other change is an update to cyr_dbtool. It documents the
> -n option (present in 2.3.9, but not in the manpage) and does
> all the operations in a single transaction, greatly speeding up
> multi-record set and delete operations. In particularly, you
> can now actually "cyr_dbtool mailboxes.db dump | \
> cyr_dbtool -n new.db set" and it's fast. Yay.
>
> I think that this is a viable patch for upstream inclusion.
> http://cyrus.brong.fastmail.fm/patches/cyrus-dbtool-transaction-2.3.9.diff
>
> Enjoy,
>
> Bron.
>
More information about the Cyrus-devel
mailing list