Cyrus patches, cyrus patches. Get yer Cyrus patches here

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) lists at
Mon Sep 10 13:39:19 EDT 2007

I am not an expert of the Cyrus Project because i'm following the
development list since only 2 months.

However i would like to know which are the motivations not to implement
the fastmail patches into the current cyrus CVS main stream ?

I read the patches and their motivations and it seems all in good
quality, motivation and documentation.

I would be pleased to see most of them committed into the mainstream.

Waiting for yours

Fabio Pietrosanti

Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:10:08PM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I've updated it with two changes - I've removed our renameinbox
> patch and added a backport of Ken's CVS commit to 2.3.9 instead.
> Just tested it, it works great.
> The other change is an update to cyr_dbtool.  It documents the
> -n option (present in 2.3.9, but not in the manpage) and does
> all the operations in a single transaction, greatly speeding up
> multi-record set and delete operations.  In particularly, you
> can now actually "cyr_dbtool mailboxes.db dump | \
> cyr_dbtool -n new.db set" and it's fast.  Yay.
> I think that this is a viable patch for upstream inclusion.
> Enjoy,
> Bron.

More information about the Cyrus-devel mailing list