reconstruct should not destroy a readable cyrus.expunge.
murch at andrew.cmu.edu
Fri Aug 11 10:17:03 EDT 2006
Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 08 Aug 2006, at 12:59, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> Paul Turgyan wrote:
>>> I can see where you want reconstruct to correct all problems with a
>>> but after validating cyrus.expunge why not just let it be, and let
>>> cyr_expire handle
>>> the deletion. This way, as you said, a user can unexpunge those
>>> messages if he wants.
>> I can't say that I disagree with you. I have this eerie feeling that
>> there is a reason that I chose to delete the expunged messages. Maybe
>> the Fastmail guys can remember.
> This is what I found on the subject:
> Just to be clear, if we're in agreement on how reconstruct should work,
Are we in agreement? Paul's patch (bug #2866) actually unexpunges the
messages. I thought that folks we arguing that cyrus.expunge and the
references messages should be left alone and omitted from cyrus.index.
> then we will submit a patch. We're also having issues with non-unique
> mailbox IDs. I'd like reconstruct to detect non-unique mailbox IDs and
> assign new mailbox IDs as appropriate. Any comments on that?
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
More information about the Cyrus-devel