reconstruct should not destroy a readable cyrus.expunge.
wes at umich.edu
Tue Aug 8 15:47:42 EDT 2006
On 08 Aug 2006, at 12:59, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Paul Turgyan wrote:
>> I can see where you want reconstruct to correct all problems with
>> a mailbox,
>> but after validating cyrus.expunge why not just let it be, and
>> let cyr_expire handle
>> the deletion. This way, as you said, a user can unexpunge those
>> messages if he wants.
> I can't say that I disagree with you. I have this eerie feeling
> that there is a reason that I chose to delete the expunged
> messages. Maybe the Fastmail guys can remember.
This is what I found on the subject:
Just to be clear, if we're in agreement on how reconstruct should
work, then we will submit a patch. We're also having issues with non-
unique mailbox IDs. I'd like reconstruct to detect non-unique
mailbox IDs and assign new mailbox IDs as appropriate. Any comments
More information about the Cyrus-devel