Question about NDPI

[Martin Weihrauch]

Thank you for your interest!

Actually, I think there is no need to develop an alternative for OpenSlide. However, I am writing an anonymizer for WSI, which will be completely in .NET / C#. Basically, OpenSlide without the tile reading part.
Hamamatsu is now fully implemented for anonymization of label, metadata, etc. Working on the next ones.

Unfortunately, I have no plans yet to open source it / give it away for free, because our company also has to pay employees and bills, but we'll see, maybe I'll find a fair model.

Best

Martin




-----Original Message-----
From: openslide-users <openslide-users-bounces+m.weihrauch=smartinmedia.com at lists.andrew.cmu.edu> On Behalf Of j.hudecek at nki.nl
Sent: Dienstag, 28. Mai 2024 14:13
To: openslide-users at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Question about NDPI

[Sie erhalten nicht häufig E-Mails von j.hudecek at nki.nl. Weitere Informationen, warum dies wichtig ist, finden Sie unter https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Hi Martin,

Are you making a new slide-reading library that will also support NDPI? Very cool!
Will you also open-source it? Sounds like it could be considered derived work.

Regards,
Jan Hudecek
________________________________________
From: openslide-users <openslide-users-bounces+j.hudecek=nki.nl at lists.andrew.cmu.edu> on behalf of Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert+openslide at cs.cmu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 11:46:35 AM
To: openslide-users at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Question about NDPI

LET OP: Deze e-mail is afkomstig van buiten de organisatie. Open alleen links of bijlagen als je de afzender kent en weet dat de inhoud veilig is.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 1:26 PM Martin Weihrauch <m.weihrauch at smartinmedia.com> wrote:
> You have this IFD structure then:
> -------------------------------------------
>
> 2 bytes:  for count of tags
> 12 bytes * (count of tags): The tags themselves
> 8 byte:  offset of next IFD
> 4 bytes * (count of tags): High bits for all tags
>
> ?

Yes, that's correct.

Best,
--Benjamin Gilbert
_______________________________________________
openslide-users mailing list
openslide-users at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/openslide-users
_______________________________________________
openslide-users mailing list
openslide-users at lists.andrew.cmu.edu
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/openslide-users