Re: Backup compaction optimization in a block-level replication environment

[ellie timoney]

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, at 11:06 AM, Deborah Pickett wrote:
> On 2019-11-20 10:03, ellie timoney wrote:
>>> foo also includes "#calendars" and "#addressbooks" on my server so there 
are weird characters to deal with.
>>> 
>> Now that's an interesting detail to consider.

>> 
> I should restate my original message because I'm being fast and loose with the meaning of "contains": two of the values for foo on my server are "#calendars" and "#addressbooks". In other words, there are top-level public mailboxes #calendars and #addressbooks which themselves contain sub-calendars and sub-addressbooks. It never occurred to me to have calendar or contacts folders deeper in the normal shared folder namespace, though it has evidently occurred to you.


Oh, I see how I misread that! And... that also complicates things for me, I think (well, it's a possibility I hadn't even considered).

I'm curious how these are working for you, or what sort of configuration and workflows leads to having #calendars and #addressbooks as top-level shared mailboxes? I've only very recently started learning how our DAV bits work (they have previously been black-boxes for me), and so far have only seen these existing in user accounts. Maybe this is a separate thread though.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/attachments/20191120/6e1e247d/attachment.html>