Draft: Bugzilla Work Flow
Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
Mon Sep 13 07:16:40 EDT 2010
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> That looks really good actually. I guess the side question is "Is Bugzilla
> the ideal tool for this?" I've seen setups where commit messages in the
> change management tool can be tied directly to tickets. It's probably
> not essential though - if we have a process and we all know how to follow
> it.
>
There's git-bugzilla for this purpose. I haven't actually worked with it
though. There's also a python-bugzilla CLI client, which we could (possibly)
use as a commit hook to update any tickets referred to in the commit message.
> Speaking of which - the auto bugzilla reminder emails are great :)
> Occasional annoyances that go away when you do the right thing are very
> useful.
>
Yeah, so is the "automagically" put someone in CC: on bug update, having
someone as a QA contact, or workflow enhancements (somebody patches some bug,
"closes" the bug and release engineering looks to forward/backporting it).
Kind regards,
--
Jeroen van Meeuwen
Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG
e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
t: +316 42 801 403
w: http://www.kolabsys.com
pgp: 9342 BF08
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list