Does Cyrus benefit greatly from increased FS buffer cache?
John Widera
jwidera at oakton.edu
Tue Apr 14 16:14:39 EDT 2009
Hi,
Last week we posted to the list for info about running Cyrus on 64-bit
RHEL. But we also needed to ask a more direct question about caching,
though, and didn't. So we are now...
That q. is, does Cyrus actually benefit from large amounts of memory in an
environment with just a few thousand users ( <1000 simultaneous sessions)
and, say, up to 750GB of mail spool?
Our plan is to throw 12-16GB at it, with the purpose of vastly increasing
the FS buffer cache (and decreasing I/O). Or, will that just be a waste
of RAM?
Some indications are that, yes, it does improve performance notably:
http://blog.fastmail.fm/2007/09/21/reiserfs-bugs-32-bit-vs-64-bit-kernels-cache-vs-inode-memory/
Anyone have any specific thoughts? Is there any other benefit we might
see from large memory allocation in 64-bit architecture?
Thanks,
John Widera
Oakton Community College
Des Plaines and Skokie, IL
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list