Sync_client error Hit upload limit 0

Ken Murchison murch at andrew.cmu.edu
Wed Apr 2 21:37:23 EDT 2008


Are you sure that you installed the new sync_client binary?  If the 
patch applied correctly, I don't see how max_count can be reported as zero.


Stephen Carr wrote:
> Dear List
> 
> I have applied the patch on our server and I regret to infom you it does
> not fix the problem.
> 
> I still get 1 "error" line this when 2 emails are being delivered at
> almost the same time.
> 
> Apr  3 08:42:29 brooks sync_client[4402]: Hit upload limit 0 at UID 22186
> for user.AAA, sending
> 
> -rw-------    1 cyrus    users       81943 Apr  3 08:42 22186.
> -rw-------    1 cyrus    users       81844 Apr  3 08:42 22187.
> 
> Also
> 
> Apr  3 09:02:45 brooks sync_client[5249]: Hit upload limit 0 at UID 119493
> for user.BBB, sending
> 
> -rw-------    1 cyrus    users        1248 Apr  3 09:02 119493.
> -rw-------    1 cyrus    users        4548 Apr  3 09:02 119494.
> 
> I have also seen the "error" when a user has moved emails from one folder
> to another folder.
> 
> Regards
> Stephen Carr
> 
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:46:33AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
>>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:19:07AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
>>>>> Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:51:50PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:28:07AM +1030, Stephen Carr wrote:
>>>>>>>> I get the following type of error (see below) during replication
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> appeared after upgrading from 2.3.8 to 2.3.11.
>>>>>>> BAH - upload_messages_from() is broken.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will reply shortly with a patch,
>>>>>> Ken - CCing you on this one since you'll want this for CVS.
>>>>>> I have compile tested this - haven't rolled it out anywhere,
>>>>>> but it's pretty trivial.
>>>>> I understand the missing check for max_count's value, but is there a
>>>>> reason why you're not checking that its negative?
>>>> unsigned
>>> Ah, right.  Since config_getint() returns signed, we should probably
>>> make
>>> max_count signed
>> Sounds reasonable - then I'm happy with <= 0 :)
>>
>> Bron.
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University


More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list