lmtpproxyd reappears in 2.3.4

[Ken Murchison]

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006, Simon Matter wrote:
>> nobody need them in 2.3.3? So my question is, do those binaries act
>> different depending on how they were called? If that's the case then the
>> rpms should also ship with the hardlinked files.
> 
> I sure hope those hardlinks are just there to keep people happy. If they are
> needed, something is wrong.  If the binaries are acting differently
> depending on how they are called, this is an extremely bad idea IMHO (give
> us a --proxy switch or somesuch, instead!).

No difference in functionality.  They are just there for old cyrus.conf 
files.


-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Systems Programmer
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University