lmtpproxyd reappears in 2.3.4
murch at andrew.cmu.edu
Thu May 25 14:56:41 EDT 2006
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006, Simon Matter wrote:
>> nobody need them in 2.3.3? So my question is, do those binaries act
>> different depending on how they were called? If that's the case then the
>> rpms should also ship with the hardlinked files.
> I sure hope those hardlinks are just there to keep people happy. If they are
> needed, something is wrong. If the binaries are acting differently
> depending on how they are called, this is an extremely bad idea IMHO (give
> us a --proxy switch or somesuch, instead!).
No difference in functionality. They are just there for old cyrus.conf
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
More information about the Info-cyrus