lmtpproxyd reappears in 2.3.4

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Wed, 24 May 2006, Simon Matter wrote:
> nobody need them in 2.3.3? So my question is, do those binaries act
> different depending on how they were called? If that's the case then the
> rpms should also ship with the hardlinked files.

I sure hope those hardlinks are just there to keep people happy. If they are
needed, something is wrong.  If the binaries are acting differently
depending on how they are called, this is an extremely bad idea IMHO (give
us a --proxy switch or somesuch, instead!).

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh