Murder

[Sam]

C.K wrote:
> The frontend and the mupdate could be the same.
> The backend should be standalone.
>
> But why not start with one machine and grow into the murder.
>   
I have built a standalone email server with murder capability, but not 
configured as murder active yet, because I want to have the second 
machine in-placed first.
> The mirror does not yet work as a cluster, it only mirrors the backend and
> can replace another server but does not work as a cluster sollution (yet).
>   
That s alright, I m not interested in cluster for this email solution 
yet. Having a second email server mirroring the frontend(mupdate) may be 
sufficient for now.

Thanks
Sam
> /C
>
> Den Fr, 2006-08-11, 01:41 skrev Sam:
>   
>> Andrew Morgan wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Sam wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> C.K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> The backend server are the actual imap/pop server.
>>>>> The frontend are a proxyserver that redirects the user to the right
>>>>> backend..
>>>>>
>>>>> /C
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> How about the Murder(mupdate) server?
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> The mupdate server keeps track of which backend stores each mailbox.
>>> You can have multiple backend and frontend servers, but only one
>>> mupdate server.  The frontend servers query the mupdate server to locate
>>> mailboxes, and the backend servers update the mupdate server when a
>>> mailbox is added or deleted.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Can I have a pair of murder server, one is mirror another? I don't know
>> what this 2 servers will called, but introduce three servers (mupdate,
>> frontend and a backend) are too much machines. If the 2-servers solution
>> is fine, will that be mupdate and frontend?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>
>