Cyrus 2.2.x vs 2.3
Ken Murchison
ken at oceana.com
Tue Aug 16 16:24:13 EDT 2005
Etienne Goyer wrote:
> Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>> * Added support for "unified" and "replicated" Murders. A Murder
>> no longer has to have discrete frontend and backend servers; any one
>> "unified" server can both proxy and serve local mailboxes (proxy
>> functionality in proxyd and lmtpproxyd has been merged with imapd and
>> lmtpd respectively), or all "replicated" servers can serve the same
>> mailboxes from a shared filesystem. The new mupdate_config option in
>> imapd.conf is used to determine whether a Murder is using a
>> "traditional", "unified" or "replicated" configuration.
>> * Ported/rewrote/integrated David Carter's mailspool replication
>> code. Development sponsored by Columbia University.
>
>
> These two really got me excited. 2.3 will really be an important
> release for HA/scalability.
>
> Could somebody expand a little about 'all "replicated" servers can serve
> the same mailboxes from a shared filesystem' ? Assuming a number of
> servers serve mailboxes from a shared filesystem, there is no point in
> Murder anymore as any server in the pool have directly access to any
> mailbox in the shared filesystem, right ?
I would consider the "replicated" Murder code experimental at best. I
began writing it for a local university to use with a SAN filesystem ,
but I don't think it was ever deployed. With David Carter's replication
code, use a "replicated" Murder is already obsolete.
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 2495 Main St. - Suite 401
716-604-0088 x26 Buffalo, NY 14214
--PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list