[OT] MUA's with "direct post" support?
wcooley at nakedape.cc
Wed Feb 4 21:08:47 EST 2004
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:03, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> However, that pretty much dictates using an MUA that supports "direct
> posting" of messages into those folders, rather than requiring them to
> be sent into the folders via SMTP (at least that's the way it seems to
> me). Anyone have any suggestions? I'd like it very much if I could get
> SquirrelMail to do this, but I'd like to try out any other alternatives
> to see if this technique is going to work.
Not that everyone in your organization will have a Linux desktop, but
Evolution 1.4 has this capability.
Wil Cooley wcooley at nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc
* * * * Linux, UNIX, Networking and Security Solutions * * * *
* Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc *
* Secure E-mail Server *
* Naked Ape Mail Defender http://nakedape.cc/r/md *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/private/info-cyrus/attachments/20040204/2357ee5d/attachment.bin
More information about the Info-cyrus