[OT] MUA's with "direct post" support?

[Wil Cooley]

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 13:03, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

> However, that pretty much dictates using an MUA that supports "direct 
> posting" of messages into those folders, rather than requiring them to 
> be sent into the folders via SMTP (at least that's the way it seems to 
> me). Anyone have any suggestions? I'd like it very much if I could get 
> SquirrelMail to do this, but I'd like to try out any other alternatives 
> to see if this technique is going to work.

Not that everyone in your organization will have a Linux desktop, but
Evolution 1.4 has this capability.

Wil
-- 
Wil Cooley                                 wcooley at nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting                        http://nakedape.cc
* * * * Linux, UNIX, Networking and Security Solutions * * * *
* Naked Ape Consulting                   http://nakedape.cc  *
*                   Secure E-mail Server                     *
* Naked Ape Mail Defender           http://nakedape.cc/r/md  *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/private/info-cyrus/attachments/20040204/2357ee5d/attachment.bin