X-Status processing for reconstruct

Rayed Alrashed rayed at riy-01-s5.saudi.net.sa
Sat Oct 11 11:29:30 EDT 2003


I am facing the same problem, I was thinking of a small program that 
login to each user and scan the X-Status for all emails in all folders, 
and apply the change to IMAP, but I guess it will take forever to finish 
for large number of users.

- Rayed


Diego Rivera wrote:

>Hello all
>
>I've recently done a successful migration from UW-IMAP to Cyrus.  The
>only drawback is that the status of the messages (in X-Status header)
>was lost.
>
>This is not a significant problem - more of an annoiance :)
>
>Would it be feasible/acceptable to add a '--status' (-S?) flag to
>reconstruct for such occasions?  That way, reconstruct could check the
>X-Status header and set the appropriate bits in the index/cache
>databases when "recovering" a migrated mailbox.
>
>Opinions?  Is there a better/cleaner way of doing this?  I'm talking
>about bulk migrations, not user-to-user via IMAP (I know it could be
>done this way, but this has a lot of limitations when it comes to
>migrating large numbers of mailboxes and users).
>
>I'd be willing to contribute with this functionality.  Perhaps
>Cyrus-IMAP 2.2 already incorporates a migration mechanism?
>
>Best
>  
>







More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list