Unexpected database recovery

[Rob Siemborski]

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

> IMHO all that pid tracking code should be added to 2.1 as well.

2.1 is going to be basically end-of-life (barring currently unforseen
issues) when I release 2.1.16 later today... and as such we've been trying
to avoid significant code changes to it.

The pid tracking stuff definitely qualifies as "significant", and as we've
only seen the problem once locally (during normal operation -- not by
explicitly killing processes in accept()) maybe once since we deployed
2.x.

-Rob

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456
Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper