Webmail application that doesn't abuse the IMAP server?
rjs3 at andrew.cmu.edu
Wed Jun 11 02:03:15 EDT 2003
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Gary Mills wrote:
> We do use that, and it probably does improve performance. It does have
> a problem with idle browser connections that accumulate with time.
> This also ties up a lot of `imapd' and `httpd' processes. It probably
> needs a client timeout someplace. I haven't had time to investigate
I'm not sure how the httpd processes are being tied up, but "tied up"
imapds that are otherwise idle don't cost you anything except some swap
and a process table entry. They're basicly free.
Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456
Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper
More information about the Info-cyrus