Question about Sieve and "filters"

[Rob Siemborski]

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Michael Fair wrote:

> If we count this one, so far we have three proposals on the table
> "filter modules", "result placeholder", and "case statement"
> each which should be discussed separately since neither are
> dependent on each other.  I've got no problem dicussing them
> we should jsut bring them up on their own threads.

And on another list.

Really, if you want to discuss extentions to sieve, the right place is on
the IETF mta-filters list (ietf-mta-filters at imc.org,
http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/index.html).

I don't think we'll be adding anything to cyrus that doesn't atleast have
an Internet-Draft published describing it.

-Rob

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456
Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper