more virtual domain funnyness

[Rob Siemborski]

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote:

> I c... so that means that global admins have to have unqualified
> usernames, which are then qualified with the default domain? If that's the
> case, then global admins can only come from the defaultdomain? That seems
> kinda.. well, dumb. Why not just have a seperate admins line specifically
> for global admins?

Why does it matter?  Admin accounts aren't real accounts anyway -- they
shouldn't be recieving mail, in any case.

I'm personally against the use of a global admins option unless there is
some significant technical advantage gained.

-Rob

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456
Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper