Cannot get loginrealms to work with 2.0.16

[Michael Fair]

Please read the mailing list over the past
couple months.  Ken Murchison has said a
lot about what needs to happen.

The primary thing is that the mail spool
needs to have domain directories created
and the best support is currently for the
normal "first character" hashing algorithm.

There should also be several notes about what
to do in the release notes and readme files
that come with 2.2.

Sorry I couldn't be more help.  I'm certain
that the CMU guys would want to know about
what problems you are experiencing compiling
Cyrus on Solaris 8 x86.

Perhaps a repost under "trying to compile 2.2"
would be appropriate since that subject would 
get the attention of the guys who've actually
set it up.  There is currently a lot of attention
being paid to getting 2.2 running and tested so
I'm sure they'll be glad to help.

Good luck,
-- Michael --

PS This might be a dumb question but you do have 
   your "sasl_pwcheck_method" set to "auxprop"
   in imapd.conf right?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christian Schulte" <cs at schulte.it>
To: "Michael Fair" <michael at daclubhouse.net>
Cc: <info-cyrus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Cannot get loginrealms to work with 2.0.16


> >
> >
> >>>The unix hierarchy separator is key here because you
> >>>want to have a "." in the username.
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>I think this would do it. But how to enable that in 2.0.16 ?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >It's probably only available as a patch in the 2.0.x
> >series (I'm not to keen on exactly which versions had 
> >what features).
> >
> >Your other choice is to skip 2.1 and jump into 2.2
> >available from CVS.  Since you're already compiling
> >your cyrus (as opposed to prepackaged binary) and
> >you want virtual domains support (and willing to go
> >to great lengths to get it), I'd suggest getting the 
> >2.2 branch which has native virtual domain support
> >built into it.
> >
> >There are a few ppl on the list who have been running
> >the 2.2 branch for a couple weeks now and don't seem
> >to be having any problems with it at all.
> >  
> >
> Thanks a lot for your help! I did a cvs checkout a few minutes ago but 
> was not able to get it compiled at once. I am using Solaris 8 on ix86 
> and there I had to deal with LD_LIBRARY_PATH and adding switches to the 
> Makefile.PL files like -L/usr/loca/lib/etc... to get perl modules 
> running, patching deliver.c to get it working with sendmail and and 
> and......
> I think I will get it working till the weekend. Should not take as long 
> as the first time because I think I really have had every problem which 
> can occure with the 2.0.16 sources on Solaris 8 with gcc !
> One more question: Is there anything I must take care off when updating 
> my current mailboxes, if I get it working the next days ? I do a "make 
> install" over the old installation hopefully replacing it completely and 
> then I only do a "reconstruct" with the new reconstruct binary and will 
> be able to start the new compiled version and do *not* loose any mail in 
> any folder or mailbox ? So I can simply install the new binaries and 
> these will work with my mail partitions ?
> Again: Thanks a lot for your help!
> 
> 
>