Sendmail configuration

[Yosvany Llerena Rodríguez]

This is my firt experience with sendmail.

I have installed and listening  SendMail V9 in the 25 port.
I have isntalled and astarted de pop3 and imap

Now i want to configurate this server to relay all external mail with a HUB
sendmail V9.
my domain is (inf.dom.dp) i have permision to delivery in de HUB sendmail
with (domain dom.dp) and this HUB is DNS too and he know my name and all
data.

With the actual configuration i can send mail to my domain (inf.dom.dp) and
all the domain managed by de HUB, but a can't i send mails to Internet or
externals domains and don't recieved yet nothing from the HUB domains.

please help me .
regards.
---- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Greenfield" <leg+ at andrew.cmu.edu>
To: "Peter Krotkov" <pete at wookie.oit.umass.edu>
Cc: <info-cyrus at lists.andrew.cmu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 02:11 PM
Subject: Re: locking problems with 2.1.9


>    Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:07:11 -0500 (EST)
>    From: Peter Krotkov <pete at wookie.oit.umass.edu>
>
>    > Do the lmtpd acquire or are they _attempting_ to acquire the lock on
>    > the cyrus.seen file?
>    >
>    > Are you using the seen_local backend instead of seen_db? This hasn't
>    > been tested by us in a long time; we've been assuming everyone is
>    > using seen_db.
>
> Weird. You aren't using seen_local, which means that lmtpd should
> never even be trying to acquire a lock on cyrus.seen (this file is
> used read only exclusively).
>
>    --with-duplicate-db=skiplist
>
> just a warning, you'll probably experience performance problems using
> the skiplist backend for duplicate delivery suppression. (If you have
> duplicate delivery suppression turned off it probably doesn't matter.)
>
>    We noticed this adventure happening yesterday and, in the end, 'master'
>    was stopped and then started.  Not a single hiccup since then (about
>    110,000 imap logins and 50,000 messages handed to lmtpd since
midnight).
>    Should this happen again I'll be sure a record the details concerning
what
>    process has/wants which locks.
>
> Ok, that would be helpful.
>
> Larry
>
>