Skiplist / best practice for 2.1 branch

Galen Johnson gjohnson at trantor.org
Mon Nov 18 18:06:02 EST 2002


Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:

>On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>  
>
>>On 18 Nov 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes:
>>    
>>
>>>1. Heavily tested and debugged AND patched BerkeleyDB 3.2, stay away
>>>   from 4.x for now.  (i.e. use the ones from RedHat or Debian, not
>>>   upstream).
>>>      
>>>
>>Red Hat now supplies 4.0.14, for example the db4-4.0.14-14.i386.rpm in
>>    
>>
>
>Then stick to Debian :-)
>
>  
>
>>Red Hat 8.0.  It appears to work OK for me, but we have small setups
>>only here... maybe we have just not met the bug(s) yet??
>>    
>>
>
>Well, people report a good range of trouble with DB4 in this list, but not
>many in DB 3.2.  Maybe too few of us still use 3.2, though.
>
>  
>
>>In general, though the statement "Use 3.2... ie. use the ones from
>>RedHat or Debian ..." is confusing, because for Red Hat 8.x users, the
>>current RH-supplied production release of these libraries is now
>>4.0.14.
>>    
>>
>
>I will keep that in mind.
>
>  
>
>>Are you recommending that RH 8.0 users running Cyrus should downgrade
>>their BDB libraries to a 3.x RPM set for db3 (perhaps as supplied for
>>    
>>
>
>No. That will break the OS.
>
>  
>
>>What will it take to get some/all of these patches into 2.1.11 or 2.2
>>or both?  Is that a worthwhile objective?  Or are these changes so
>>    
>>
>
>No. CMU is slowly making their mind about the patches while they study them,
>but they will take a lot of time to leak into cyrus.  And I don't expect all
>of them to, either.
>
>  
>
>>Linux-specific that they have would negative consequences if applied
>>to a source tree used for a Solaris or *BSD build??  With Linux being
>>    
>>
>
>No negative consequences that I know of.  But increased resilience hides the
>real problems sometimes.
>
>  
>
>>putting this info into a FAQ (as well as making it the default in 2.2)
>>seems approriate.
>>    
>>
>
>It is in both AFAIK.
>
>  
>
Correct me if I'm wrong...wasn't one of the changes with 2.1.10 the 
ability to run with BDB 4.1?

=G=






More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list