PostgreSQL backend: a waste of time?

[+archive.info-cyrus at utdallas.edu]

--On Monday, November 25, 2002 4:36 PM +0100 Noll Janos 
<johnzero at johnzero.hu> wrote:

|  I think that's a very good idea, but we found that MySQL is much faster
| than Postgres, when there are no complex queries (this is the case here),
| so it might be a better idea to use MySQL.

Seems kinda ironic in a way---doesn't MySQL use BerkeleyDB?  I guess it's 
all in the indexing/caching....

Amos