Return-path header control

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh hmh at
Tue Dec 17 12:28:12 EST 2002

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
> 3. Remove: removes any existing Return-Path and does not add a new
> one.

I suppose this one would be fine, although I wonder why would anyone use it
instead of "overwrite".  Sieve really can benefit from a Return-Path header.

> 4. Ignore: does nothing, leaves any existing Return-Path header(s) in
> place.

Not a good idea, I am not doing that.

  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list