[Disksim-users] Why the overall average response time, almost 20000, is so big?
leon hsu
liangxiongxu at gmail.com
Tue Aug 14 13:45:53 EDT 2012
That's very helpful. I will change the trace and test them again.
Thanks for YueYingLiang and Anjo,
Your response gets me out of my problem.
Leon
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Yinliang Yue <yueyinliang at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have noticed that the average time interval between two I/O requests is
> too small. The first column means the I/O arrive time (ms), you issued 33
> I/Os in 8.8ms. The average time interval between two I/O requests is only
> 0.27ms. However, the disk I/O access time (access time = data transfer
> time + rotation time + seek time) is far larger than 0.27ms. There are too
> many pending I/O requests in the waiting queue and so the average response
> time is Incredibly large.
>
>
> 2012/8/14 leon hsu <liangxiongxu at gmail.com>
>
>> Hi yueyinliang,
>> Hopefully, the name is same with your mail: ) Thanks for you reply.
>>
>> The attaching file is the hard disk configuration. I only have one hard
>> disk.
>>
>> Could you take a look and check the configuration for me? Thank you so
>> much.
>>
>> The ascii trace looks like this:
>>
>> 0 0 0 24 0
>> 0 0 0 24 1
>> 1 0 24 16 0
>> 1.5 0 40 16 0
>> 2 0 56 16 0
>> 2.2 0 72 16 0
>> 2.4 0 88 16 0
>> 2.6 0 104 16 0
>> 2.8 0 120 16 0
>> 3 0 136 8 0
>> 3.125 0 144 8 0
>> 3.25 0 152 8 0
>> 3.375 0 160 8 0
>> 3.5 0 168 8 0
>> 3.625 0 176 8 0
>> 3.75 0 184 8 0
>> 3.875 0 192 8 0
>> 4 0 200 8 0
>> 4.333333 0 208 8 0
>> 4.666667 0 216 8 0
>> 5 0 224 8 0
>> 5.333333 0 232 8 0
>> 5.666667 0 240 8 0
>> 6 0 248 8 0
>> 6.333333 0 256 8 0
>> 6.666667 0 264 8 0
>> 7 0 272 16 0
>> 7.5 0 288 16 0
>> 8 0 304 16 0
>> 8.2 0 320 16 0
>> 8.4 0 336 16 0
>> 8.6 0 352 16 0
>> 8.8 0 368 16 0
>>
>>
>>
>> Leon
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Yinliang Yue <yueyinliang at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> There are so many I/O requests waiting in the queue. I do not know the
>>> details of your storage systems, such as how many disks, how these disks
>>> are organized. I suggest you check your storage configuration.
>>>
>>> 2012/8/13 leon hsu <liangxiongxu at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi, everybody,
>>>>
>>>> I need you help:-)
>>>>
>>>> When I set the "I/O Trace Time Scale" in disksim_iosim to 1, the
>>>> simulator shows a saturation error before.
>>>> But when I change "I/O Trace Time Scale" in disksim_iosim to 10, the
>>>> error disappeared.
>>>>
>>>> I think that is because the "request arrival time" of the trace file is
>>>> too small, which results that the number of the arriving requests in one
>>>> second is more than ones that the simulator could deal with in one second.
>>>> So I change the "I/O Trace Time Scale" in disksim_iosim to 10.
>>>>
>>>> Next, I run it again, but the weired result made me crazy. When I ran
>>>> disksim using my ascii trace file, the overall response time, almost 20000,
>>>> is too big to believable.
>>>>
>>>> Do anybody could tell me the reason and how to solve this problem.
>>>> Thank you so much. I am so appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I set the "request arrival time" like the following style.
>>>>
>>>> 0.5
>>>> 0.75
>>>> 1
>>>> 1.2000
>>>> 1.4000
>>>> 1.5000
>>>> 1.7000
>>>> 2.0
>>>> .....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully, it could give some hints to find out my problem. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Leon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Disksim-users mailing list
>>>> Disksim-users at ece.cmu.edu
>>>> https://sos.ece.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/disksim-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 此致
>>> 敬礼
>>>
>>> 岳银亮
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Cailiang Xu
>>
>> Tel: 732.789.6683
>>
>> Email: liangxiongxu at gmail.com
>>
>> Computer Architecture & System Lab
>> <liangxiongxu at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> 此致
> 敬礼
>
> 岳银亮
>
>
--
Cailiang Xu
Tel: 732.789.6683
Email: liangxiongxu at gmail.com
Computer Architecture & System Lab
<liangxiongxu at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/disksim-users/attachments/20120814/a84bce52/attachment.html>
More information about the Disksim-users
mailing list