compiler warning on freebsd

Alexey Melnikov alexey.melnikov at isode.com
Fri Sep 2 07:01:42 EDT 2011


Julien ÉLIE wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
>
>>> No problem if I do not use the "strict-prototypes" warning with GCC.
>>>
>>> Line 353 is:
>>> int (*proc)();
>>> in sasl_callback_t definition.
>>
>> I might have fixes for these in my private fork. I will try to apply
>> them to the HEAD.
>
> Oh, that's great!  Many thanks.
> We're using Cyrus SASL for the AUTHINFO SASL extension of the news 
> server INN.

This is on the trunk now.

>>> By the way, is an official 2.1.24 release planned?
>>
>> Yes. I think I've just missed the internal deadline (it was September 
>> 1st).
>
> No problem.  I hope 2.1.24 will be released this year.

I surely hope so too :-).

> It contains useful improvements compared with 2.1.23, and also a 
> better support for 64bit platforms.

Yes.
Also some code cleanup, fixes to some crashes in libsasl and a couple of 
new SASL mechanisms (SCRAM & GS2).

> I do not see documentation for sasl_server_done() in 2.1.24rc1.  I 
> still see sasl_done() everywhere.  Shouldn't it be changed?

I will have a look. sasl_done() can still be used, but 
sasl_server_done/sasl_client_done should be used instead whenever possible.



More information about the Cyrus-sasl mailing list