Bring back ANNOTATEMORE support

Dilyan Palauzov Dilyan.Palauzov at
Tue Sep 11 21:21:43 EDT 2018

Hello Samir,

if the opt-in ANNOTATEMORE feature is something that only you will use, as it currently looks like, I see no reason to bother others with it.


On September 11, 2018 2:40:48 PM PDT, Samir Aguiar <samir.aguiar at> wrote:
>Hi Dilyan,
>On 09/11/2018 06:17 PM, Dilyan Palauzov wrote:
>> it does not make sense to keep  the ANNOTATEMORE code just for your
>specific case.
>> You are entitled to issue an updated client software dealing with
>METADATA and ask users to update, or for your server to revert the
>respective change.
>Yes, absolutely. We will need to revert that change and restore
>ANNOTATEMORE support anyway since it's not possible at the moment for
>all of our clients to upgrade.
>But I believe my question was ill-phrased. I actually meant to ask if
>such revert, after done by us, would be accepted upstream as an opt-in
>feature, or if the team has already decided to drop that implementation
>for good.
>Kind regards,
>Samir Aguiar

More information about the Cyrus-devel mailing list