Add cyrus-devel list to Bugzilla bugs?

[Dave McMurtrie]

Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 15:26 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>>> Look for useqacontact.
>>> First, thanks for saving me a ton of time, Dan.  useqacontact was
>>> set to "off", and I changed that so it's now on.
>>> I noticed that pretty much every component of the Cyrus IMAP product
>>> already had a QA Contact defined as
>>> cyrus-bugzilla at lists.andrew.cmu.edu, which would, as the address
>>> implies, be delivered to the cyrus-bugzilla list.
>>> The archives of this list show that some amount of mail was already
>>> being sent there, but if useqacontact does what it's documented to
>>> do, this list should now begin getting a lot more mail.
>>> Is everyone okay with just keeping things the way they are
>>> configured now, assuming that the mail is actually being sent out,
>>> or would you rather I change the QA contact to be
>>> cyrus-devel at lists.andrew.cmu.edu instead of
>>> cyrus-bugzilla at lists.andrew.cmu.edu?
>> I can't see why we can't sign up to cyrus-bugzilla if we want to see it!
> 
> There hasn't been any traffic on cyrus-bugzilla since January 2010
> according to the archives - and that was two people asking
> troubleshooting questions.
> 
> You have to go back to April 2007 to see bug traffic.
> 
> <https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/private/cyrus-bugzilla/>
> 
> Doesn't seem to me like it is working.

useqacontact was previously disabled.  I enabled that this morning.  I 
just created and resolved a test bug, and mail was sent to 
cyrus-bugzilla at lists.andrew.cmu.edu.

I *think* everything is working at this point.

Thanks,

Dave
-- 
Dave McMurtrie, SPE
Email Systems Team Leader
Carnegie Mellon University,
Computing Services