Add cyrus-devel list to Bugzilla bugs?

[Adam Tauno Williams]

On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 15:26 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > >Look for useqacontact.
> > First, thanks for saving me a ton of time, Dan.  useqacontact was
> > set to "off", and I changed that so it's now on.
> > I noticed that pretty much every component of the Cyrus IMAP product
> > already had a QA Contact defined as
> > cyrus-bugzilla at lists.andrew.cmu.edu, which would, as the address
> > implies, be delivered to the cyrus-bugzilla list.
> > The archives of this list show that some amount of mail was already
> > being sent there, but if useqacontact does what it's documented to
> > do, this list should now begin getting a lot more mail.
> > Is everyone okay with just keeping things the way they are
> > configured now, assuming that the mail is actually being sent out,
> > or would you rather I change the QA contact to be
> > cyrus-devel at lists.andrew.cmu.edu instead of
> > cyrus-bugzilla at lists.andrew.cmu.edu?
> I can't see why we can't sign up to cyrus-bugzilla if we want to see it!

There hasn't been any traffic on cyrus-bugzilla since January 2010
according to the archives - and that was two people asking
troubleshooting questions.

You have to go back to April 2007 to see bug traffic.

<https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/private/cyrus-bugzilla/>

Doesn't seem to me like it is working.

> Is there any way to automatically set up the reply-to so that replies
> come to cyrus-devel?  That way we can choose if we want to see every bug
> or only the discussion that bugs spark...
-- 
Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> LPIC-1, Novell CLA
<http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com>
OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba