Cyrus 2.3.13 RC1
wes at umich.edu
Wed Oct 8 19:57:06 EDT 2008
On 03 Oct 2008, at 07:19, Lorenzo M. Catucci wrote:
> As for bugzilla, the bug-tracker should be better advertised both on
> the website and in released documentation;
I agree. I'd really like it if the main cyrus page was just a
framework to get to bugzilla, the wiki, the mailing lists, and the
download pages. The static pages are not really serving the cyrus
community very well, probably they never have. But if users read &
contributed to the bugzilla, the wiki, and the mailing list (I feel
like I'm missing something else, but I can't think of it), then we'd
be doing much better.
> I think some summary in the
> changelogs like "fixes xxx bugzilla bugs and introduces yyy bugzilla
> enhancements" would be nice to show...
As a separate topic, I agree. The converse is also true: close
bugzilla entries should refer to CVS diffs. Personally, my CVS
what was changed
who was involved in the change
And my closed bugzilla entries refer back to the CVS-web diff URLs.
Perhaps we could agree on a methodology, here...
More information about the Cyrus-devel