should sync_server talk to mupdate?
murch at andrew.cmu.edu
Wed Jul 26 11:41:16 EDT 2006
Wesley Craig wrote:
> I've my replica backend without access to my update server, reasoning
> that sync_server -- the only thing running -- doesn't need access.
> However, when sync_client requests deletes or renames, sync_server seems
> to attempt to contact the mupdate server. I suppose I *could* remove
> the mupdate server configuration from the replica, but is there a
> circumstance under which sync_server ought to be talking to the mupdate
OTH I can't think of any, but I'd have to look at the code.
> It seems like calls to mboxlist_deletemailbox() could set the local_only
> flag. mboxlist_renamemailbox() doesn't have such a flag, but presumably
> would need one. sync_reset has the same issues.
Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
Carnegie Mellon University
More information about the Cyrus-devel