reconstruct should not destroy a readable cyrus.expunge.
pturgyan at umich.edu
Fri Aug 11 11:12:32 EDT 2006
This patch was an alternate patch that unexpunged the messages in the
This patch was submitted before our discussion of just verifying the
cyrus.expunge file and the
deleted but unexpunged messages.
Can you just close that bug, and I'll submit a new bug & patch when
I get reconstruct running again.
On Aug 11, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Wesley Craig wrote:
>> On 08 Aug 2006, at 12:59, Ken Murchison wrote:
>>> Paul Turgyan wrote:
>>>> I can see where you want reconstruct to correct all problems
>>>> with a mailbox,
>>>> but after validating cyrus.expunge why not just let it be, and
>>>> let cyr_expire handle
>>>> the deletion. This way, as you said, a user can unexpunge those
>>>> messages if he wants.
>>> I can't say that I disagree with you. I have this eerie feeling
>>> that there is a reason that I chose to delete the expunged
>>> messages. Maybe the Fastmail guys can remember.
>> This is what I found on the subject:
>> Just to be clear, if we're in agreement on how reconstruct should
> Are we in agreement? Paul's patch (bug #2866) actually unexpunges
> the messages. I thought that folks we arguing that cyrus.expunge
> and the references messages should be left alone and omitted from
>> then we will submit a patch. We're also having issues with non-
>> unique mailbox IDs. I'd like reconstruct to detect non-unique
>> mailbox IDs and assign new mailbox IDs as appropriate. Any
>> comments on that?
> Sounds reasonable.
> Kenneth Murchison
> Systems Programmer
> Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer
> Carnegie Mellon University
More information about the Cyrus-devel