[SCA-Dance] Fw: being picky about Arbeau's double step

Mary Railing mrailing2 at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 23 23:16:06 EDT 2008


[Boy do I hate the way this list is set up.  Please-- can we have the default be for replies to go to the list, not the individual?]


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Mary Railing <mrailing2 at yahoo.com>
To: Marianne Perdomo Machin <marianne at historiaviva.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 12:41:21 PM
Subject: Re: [SCA-Dance] being picky about Arbeau's double step


As far as I can tell, the "grapevine step" version of Arbeau's double is a Scadianism.  I seem to remember Master Sion telling me that it was  the result of Scadians trying to make sense of Mabel Dolmetch's description of the bransle double in her book "Dances of England and France"..  I vaguely remember her descriptions of steps in general being much more complex and balletic than the original sources, but I don't have access to the book to check exactly what she said about the bransle double. (Dolmetsch was an early reconstructor of historical dances who freely interpreted her sources.)  The fact that many folk dances use a step sequence like this to travel sideways has probably reinforced the notion that this is an authentic way to dance the bransle; however, Arbeau says nothing about stepping behind the foot.  His description is like what you wrote for the LoC video.  Moreover, I can't think of any period pictures of people dancing that show a
 grapevine step.  (Having said this, someone will probably point one out!)  There are many pictures that show people turning their bodies so that they are actually walking forwards or backwards while holding hands in a line, rather than stepping sideways, but that is as close to a grapevine step as I can recall seeing.

--Urraca



________________________________
From: Marianne Perdomo Machin <marianne at historiaviva.org>
To: SCA Dance <sca-dance at sca-dance.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 8:41:03 AM
Subject: [SCA-Dance] being picky about Arbeau's double step

Hello!

I was wondering about something a bit odd... the real "correct" way of 
doing Arbeau's double step in branles.
The way I've been doing it for years is (for double left):

- take a step sideways with left foot
- place right foot close to and slightly behind left foot
- take a step sideways with left foot
- place right foot right by left foot

However, the LOC videos take a more conservative interpretation of 
Arbeau's description:
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/dihtml/divideos.html#vc043

That is:

- take a step sideways with left foot
- place right foot close to left foot
- take a step sideways with left foot
- place right foot right by left foot

It's the second movement that is the problem: "pied approché"
Placing it behind only makes it seem more natural,but maybe that's 
because I'm used to it...

Any idea what is correct and why?


Thanks!


Leonor, being picky...


________________________________________________________________
To send mail to the entire list, be sure sca-dance at sca-dance.org is listed
in the To line of any response.

To Unsubscribe send mail to: sca-dance-request at sca-dance.org
________________________________________________________________


      


More information about the Sca-dance mailing list