Shared folder permissions
John
john-cyrus at earthspike.net
Thu Jul 30 14:45:02 EDT 2015
The RFC says it’s c=k+x and d=t+e. I want users to be able to delete
messages (t) but not delete mailboxes (x), so I am applying a permission
of lrswiptek, but when I read it back it shows lrswipktecd:
|localhost> lam Not*
NotUser:
anyone lrs
NotUser/Shared1:
bob lrswipktecd
anyone lrs
NotUser/Shared1/Test1:
bob lrswipktecd
anyone lrs
NotUser/Shared2:
anyone lrs
localhost> sam Not*2 bob lrswiptek
Setting ACL on NotUser/Shared2...OK.
localhost> lam Not*
NotUser:
anyone lrs
NotUser/Shared1:
bob lrswipktecd
anyone lrs
NotUser/Shared1/Test1:
bob lrswipktecd
anyone lrs
NotUser/Shared2:
anyone lrs
bob lrswipktecd
|
So I am wondering if somehow a pre-2.3.0 database has crept in and I
need to upgrade it somehow?
John
On 30/07/15 19:26, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:09 +0100, John wrote:
>> I set the ACL to lrswiptek and it then shows as lrswipktecd. Have I
>> missed a database migration step at some point in the past? The
>> current server is running 2.4.12 (and I have a project to move it all
>> to 2.5.x soon).
> Don't use d & w if you want fine-grained permissions control; old d, r
> & w imply other permissions. If I recall correctly: d = t+x and w
> implies d.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/attachments/20150730/f5342cae/attachment.html
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list