Another 2.4 upgrade horror story

[Sebastian Hagedorn]

--On 26. September 2012 09:42:17 +0300 Janne Peltonen 
<janne.peltonen at helsinki.fi> wrote:

> As it happened, we didn't have any trouble with the reconstruction of any
> mailboxes, the process went flawlessly - it was just slow.

Same here.

> Also, it did
> cause observable slowness only because at first, I hadn't reconstructed
> the mailboxes systematically but had trusted the system to do it on
> demand. After the business day and daily peak usage was over, I set up
> such a number of reconstruction processes that the system didn't choke on
> them, and everything (~60k mailboxes) was reconstructed before next
> morning.

We did it systematically from the start, but that wasn't enough.
-- 
     .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-W (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                 .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5313 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/attachments/20120926/2645cce0/attachment.bin