branch 2.4 on prod
Adam Tauno Williams
awilliam at whitemice.org
Tue Sep 25 07:42:07 EDT 2012
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 23:05 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Deniss Gaplevsky wrote:
> > hello,
> > i have a question to Brong as main powering force of cyrus development.
> > I know cyrus is used at fastmail/opera for serving a lot of users.
> > But stable branch 2.4 has a lot of performance related issues - like
> > statuscache usage, grisly index lookups, etc - fixed in 2.5 which is not
> > stable and not available as tarballs so far.
> > Im curious what is the cyrus branch/version in use at Fastmail/Opera
> > currently ? How well it is compatible to cyrus 2.4 branch ?
> We're running master + our local patches in production at FastMail.
> You may have noticed a bunch of work last week on master - I'm pushing
> as much time as I can into preparing for a real 2.5 release. Even if
> it doesn't include everything we want, we can do a 2.6 more quickly next
And more frequent, but less monumental, 'major' version jumps is nice,
BTW. 2.3.x --> 2.4.x was a huge [and a bit scary] jump. Slowly
letting the awesome soak in is preferred.
BTW, 2.4.x may have some warts, but performance is still much improved
over 2.3.x; at least in my experience.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/attachments/20120925/baa9966a/attachment.bin
More information about the Info-cyrus