POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?
david.lang at digitalinsight.com
Fri Apr 22 19:21:33 EDT 2011
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> The question came up from the following bug report:
> Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left.
> Reconstruct gave no information about the files on disk at
> I see 4 options, can I'd like some opinions on what people
> think reconstruct should do. Speak now(ish) or hold your
> 1) what we do now - require a cyrus.header in the directory
> or ignore it.
> 2) like (1) but warn about the directory with no cyrus.header
> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
> 4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file
> OR at least one message file in the directory before
> creating the mailbox. (so an empty directory doesn't generate
> a bogus mailbox, and neither does one containing nothing that
> looks like it belongs in a mailbox)
I think either 3 is the best answer with 4 being a reasonably close second.
I tend to be a person who would rather have extra stuff show up and deal with it
rather than run the risk of not getting something that I need.
I don't think that there's a real problem with creating 'extra' mailboxes if
there are extra directories, it's easy enough for the user to delete them.
saying that there needs to be a message or a cyrus.* file is a huristic that
sounds like it will work most of the time, but not always.
More information about the Info-cyrus