Problem with Shared Mailbox - Cyrus Aggregation - Backend - 2.4.1

[Lucas Zinato Carraro]

Hi, Bron,

This works with Cyrus Frontend 2.4.1
Thanks


On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Bron Gondwana <brong at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 01:14:12AM -0200, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
>> My configuration
>>
>> User Inbox         - Backend cyrus 2.4.1
>> +SharedFolderA - Backend cyrus 2.4.1
>> +SharedFolderB - Backend cyrus 2.3.16
>>
>> Client used  Mozilla Thunderbird 3.1.4
>>
>> In File Subscribe i can see all Folders ( INBOX, SharedFolderA, SharedFolderB )
>> When i click in subscribe, i dont have any problem or erroneus message
>>
>> I see " shared folder"  in my HOME server normal,  but folders in
>> another server ( SharedFolderB )
>> appears in Grey Italic.
>>
>> Reference:
>>
>> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Grey_italic_folders
>>
>> "" A IMAP folder will be displayed in grey italics if the folder has a
>> \Noselect flag. Normally this means
>>  the folder can contain child folders, but not messages. [1] This is a
>> IMAP protocol flag, not one of
>>  the folder flags that can be set using the Folder Flag extension. """"
>>
>> If i uncheck the option "Show only subscribed folder" in Config >>
>> Account >> Server >> Advanced.
>> I can work normal with all mailboxes...
>>
>> This is the correct behavior in Cyrus 2.4.1 ?
>>
>> In Cyrus 2.3.16 i dont have to set this option, i can subscribe normal in
>> remote mailboxes servers.
>>
>> With Cyrus 2.4.0 i see the folders to subscribe, but the folders are
>> not avaiable i dont see
>> any folder, in Cyrus 2.4.1 i see this folders, but  in grey italic.
>
> Ok - what's the version on your frontend?  If that's running 2.4.1
> (and restarted) then it should be filtering out the \Noselect flag
> if (and only if) the mailbox exists in murder.
>
> All your "LSUB" response is coming from the Inbox server - and it
> has \Noselect for all the folders that aren't on that same server.
> The frontend the passes this to pipe_lsub (in imap_proxy.c) which
> filters the \Noselect flag off.
>
> There was a bug in 2.4.0 (and presumably earlier, I didn't touch
> that code before) where it wasn't removing \Noselect, despite a
> comment to the effect that it should be.  Upgrade your frontend
> to 2.4.1 and that will be fixed.
>
> Bron.
>