Question about reconstruct

[Brian Awood]

On Tuesday 12 January 2010 18:15:29 Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:57:28AM -0800, wcooley at nakedape.cc wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps it would be a good idea, then, to make the '-k' behavior the
> > default and use another option to invert the logic?
> 
> Absolutely... it will probably happen in 2.4 or 2.5... it's on my list
> of incompatible changes!

If anyone is interested, here's a patch that we use that turns on -k by 
default when delayed expunge is enabled.  We've never seen a need for the "non 
-k" behavior since there are other ways to achieve the same results, if you 
really do need to delete messages & meta data.  Of course this patch is a lot 
larger than it needs to be for just the -k change, since it adds a -w 
(warning) and -e (add un-indexed files to expunge).  Also, it looks like a lot 
of changes, but it's mostly additional if statements and some corresponding 
formatting fixes.

-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reconstruct.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 15529 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/attachments/20100112/5ca2d7bd/attachment.bin