setting up replication

[Patrick Boutilier]

On 11/18/2009 01:15 PM, Johannes Rußek wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> thanks for the recommendation, but you have to note that this is RHEL
> cyrus, which means there are a lot of backports in it..

Usually security fixes though.

> As usual, RH version is not the same as upstream version. Also with RH
> you are pretty much bound to what you get :)

You could try this source RPM:


http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.3.15-4.src.rpm




> I'll get both machines to RHEL's 2.3.9 first, then try replication
> again.
> Thanks everybody,
> Johannes
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2009, 10:43 -0500 schrieb Brian Awood:
>> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 @ 13:11, Patrick Boutilier wrote:
>>> On 11/17/2009 01:34 PM, Johannes Rußek wrote:
>>>> Nope, i'm not. is this necessary?
>>>> it's 2.3.9 on the master and 2.3.7 on the replica.
>>>> if that's the problem i will take care of that first.
>>>
>>> They are both 2.3.x so that shouldn't be a problem. However those
>>> versions are relatively old. 2.3.15 is the latest in the 2.3
>>> series.
>>>
>>> I just setup replication a couple of weeks ago and haven't seen any
>>> of those errors.
>>
>> I believe there were major changes in the sync protocol between 2.3.7
>> &  2.3.9, enough to probably make them incompatible.  Although, I
>> would also recommend running 2.3.15 over anything older.
>>
>> -Brian
>> ----
>> Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
>> Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
>> List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html