upgrading a 2.2.12 murder to 2.3.14
    Nic Bernstein 
    nic at onlight.com
       
    Thu Jul 16 11:05:56 EDT 2009
    
    
  
On 07/16/2009 09:55 AM, Brian Awood wrote:
> On Thursday 16 July 2009 @ 05:21, Gavin Gray wrote:
>   
> replication is significantly slower than xfer, but it shouldn't affect 
> the speed of xfer.  We wrote some scripts to prevent xfer from 
> getting too far ahead of replication.  Since our replicas are a key 
> part of our DR/backup strategy, we never would want to get in a 
> situation where a large amount of data wasn't replicated.  In your 
> situation it shouldn't matter since the data is not replicated 
> currently, you should just be able to enable rolling replication and 
> let it catch up.  If you still would like to keep xfer from getting 
> too far ahead of replication, I can probably post the scripts we use 
> for this.  
>
> -Brian
>   
Brian,
I certainly would be interested in seeing those.  Please post them here, 
or to the Wiki.
Best regards,
    -nic
-- 
Nic Bernstein                             nic at onlight.com
Onlight llc.                              www.onlight.com
219 N. Milwaukee St., Suite 2a			  v. 414.272.4477
Milwaukee, Wisconsin  53202
    
    
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list