Elusive replication bug in 2.3.13

Janne Peltonen janne.peltonen at helsinki.fi
Tue Jan 13 03:50:18 EST 2009


On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:38:56AM -0600, Raphael Jaffey wrote:
> for a discussion of what looks like the same problem you're
> experiencing and a workaround that seems to solve the problem.

Thanks for the info.

> In my case it's related to how many of those inboxes have quotas  
> associated with them and the use of the default 'quota_db' of  
> 'quotalegacy'.  I was able to work around the replication problem by  
> switching 'quota_db' to 'skiplist' on the replica.  Unfortunately I  
> couldn't get berkeley or berkeley-hash to work reliably and as I'm  
> unsure as to which database other than 'quotalegacy' would be most  
> appropriate.  So far, no one has suggested anything.

I could only find this thread that remotely touches the subject:


and it's four years old... How long did it take you to convert your quota
db from the legacy format to skiplist? Was it doable?

> What happens when you try to delete user.jmm on the master?  Does the  
> IMAP process handling the delete segfault?

Yes, it does.

Janne Peltonen <janne.peltonen at helsinki.fi> PGP Key ID: 0x9CFAC88B
Please consider membership of the Hospitality Club (http://www.hospitalityclub.org)

More information about the Info-cyrus mailing list