choosing a file system
Adam Tauno Williams
awilliam at whitemice.org
Sun Jan 4 16:02:14 EST 2009
> On the other hand, XFS was the only Linux filesystems capable to handle our
> 5 million files (at that time, we're now at 33 million) we had in these
> days with an acceptable performance. Ext3 was way too slow with directories
> with > 1000 files (but many things have changed from kernel 2.4.x to
> nowadays kernels)
It has; not Cyrus but another application we had, and we had to make a
'hashed' directory structure to avoid the many-files-in-a-directory
situation. But this isn't true anymore, ext3 performs well with very
large directories.
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list