cyrus on iscsi
Jeffrey Eaton
jeaton at cmu.edu
Thu Feb 28 09:48:00 EST 2008
Gary Mills wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:20:39PM -0500, Jeffrey T Eaton wrote:
>> Our system consists of 10 backend servers. Each is a Sun v240 running
>> Solaris 8, with a QLogic iSCSI initiator with two gigabit ethernet
>> links to our SAN network. Each system mounts 4x250 GB paritions for
>> mailbox storage, and one 50GB partition for Cyrus databases, logs, and
>> sieve scripts.
>
> If you upgrade to Solaris 10, you can omit the QLogic cards by using
> the native Iscsi initiator instead. It may actually work better.
>
We do have some Solaris 10 machines (not mail servers) using the native
software iSCSI initiator. There was some concern about performance,
particularly when doing heavy IO, such as for backups. I haven't
personally looked to compare the relative performance of the two, however.
We will probably be upgrading to Solaris 10 for our backend mailservers
in the very near future, because Sun doesn't appear to be selling any
more v240's, and the v245's won't boot Solaris 8. We may also seriously
consider dropping the Sun hardware entirely, and moving toward Linux.
The rest of our mail infrastructure already runs on Linux (frontends,
mupdate, and smtp/mx layer), so it seems likely that we will at least
consider it.
-jeaton
More information about the Info-cyrus
mailing list